Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> writes: > What are you talking about? Of fucking course it warns when you use > complex. I never said it did not.
I said that you have to build with complex and you said: | I missed it when I went over the example, and C does not check typedefs, | only the underlying type. then: | Yes, I am aware, and as I pointed out, I was checking the complex build, I interpreted this as an assertion that you built the example with complex, which is clearly not true. (Yes, I also wish C had a strong typedef.) This will be fixed when we have one command to compile all examples into one executable. Should I merge the branch that does that now instead of holding off until we can run the test suite that way? I think there is value in just having the compiler check all the examples.
pgpKbHhZ5qgXA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
