On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Jed Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> writes: > > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Jed Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> writes: > >> > Yes, I am aware, and as I pointed out, I was checking the complex > build, > >> > >> You didn't mention "complex" in this thread, just something about C > >> typedefs which isn't true because you get warnings like this in C. > >> > >> warning: incompatible pointer types passing 'PetscScalar *' (aka > '_Complex > >> double *') to parameter of type 'PetscReal *' (aka 'double *') > >> [-Wincompatible-pointer-types] > >> ierr = VecNorm(Z,NORM_2,&dp);CHKERRQ(ierr); /* dp > <- > >> z'*z = e'*A'*B'*B*A'*e' */ > >> ^ > > > > > > I obviously do not get this warning. > > What compiler? Both gcc and clang warn. > I can't believe you are interested: i686-apple-darwin10-gcc-4.2.1 (GCC) 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5664) Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Matt -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener
