On Jul 11, 2014, at 1:29 PM, Satish Balay <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yeah - I had merged this branch to next to test it out. Lisandro is > on travel - so might not be checking e-mails. > > Perhaps tao/complex build should be enabled only for c99/complex.. Are all the failures only for C++ complex? How easy/hard would they be too fix. In the long run just getting tao complex clean would make our lives simpler. Barry > > Satish > > On Fri, 11 Jul 2014, Barry Smith wrote: > >> >> There are a truck load of complex related errors in tao in next: >> http://ftp.mcs.anl.gov/pub/petsc/nightlylogs/archive/2014/07/10/filtered-make_next_arch-freebsd-cxx-cmplx-pkgs-dbg_wii.log >> see also the other complex builds at >> http://ftp.mcs.anl.gov/pub/petsc/nightlylogs/archive/2014/07/10/next.html >> >> >> not sure if they are related to your change >> >> Barry >> >> >> On Jul 8, 2014, at 8:57 AM, Lisandro Dalcin <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 8 July 2014 15:16, Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Lisandro Dalcin <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Some time ago I merged tao4py in petsc4py following PETSc. Now I >>>>> realize that TA0 is not available for --with-scalar-type=complex, all >>>>> of the TAO API is not built. Adding support for this case in petsc4py >>>>> will be rather involved, so I want to propose an alternative. >>>>> >>>>> I have a rather small patch that enables the compile of interface TAO >>>>> APIs. With this patch, I can build petsc4py, but obviously any >>>>> attempt of use a specific TAO solver type fails at runtime because the >>>>> solve implementations are not registered. But at least, petsc4py can >>>>> be built with complex scalars and all other PETSc components can be >>>>> used normally. >>>>> >>>>> What do you think? If you accept this proposal, I'll put all this in a >>>>> branch for review. Additionally, I would like to merge this fix into >>>>> maint. >>>> >>>> >>>> That sounds fine to me. We will fix this for the next release, so it would >>>> just hang around until then. >>>> >>> >>> https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/branch/dalcinl/tao-complex_scalars >>> >>> This hook is a hack, but seems the easiest way to support complex scalars: >>> https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/commits/a62a097f5bb5c39fb23ca6e1f9f37f7c197bfa6d?at=master#Lsrc/tao/matrix/lmvmmat.cT5 >>> >>> Please review, >>> >>> -- >>> Lisandro Dalcin >>> --------------- >>> CIMEC (UNL/CONICET) >>> Predio CONICET-Santa Fe >>> Colectora RN 168 Km 472, Paraje El Pozo >>> 3000 Santa Fe, Argentina >>> Tel: +54-342-4511594 (ext 1016) >>> Tel/Fax: +54-342-4511169 >> >> >
