On 15 July 2014 11:19, Lisandro Dalcin <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11 July 2014 15:35, Barry Smith <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Jul 11, 2014, at 1:29 PM, Satish Balay <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Yeah - I had merged this branch to next to test it out. Lisandro is >>> on travel - so might not be checking e-mails. >>> >>> Perhaps tao/complex build should be enabled only for c99/complex.. >> >> Are all the failures only for C++ complex? How easy/hard would they be >> too fix. In the long run just getting tao complex clean would make our lives >> simpler. >> > > I've just arrived to my final destination. Let me test a C++ complex > build and fix it. I do not expect it to be hard. >
Satish, I pushed a fix to dalcinl/tao-complex_scalars, please merge again in next. It was easy but tedious: just add PetscRealPart() in many places https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/commits/658c1fc477a1980c4af05d671ad3d2160ec573ac -- Lisandro Dalcin --------------- CIMEC (UNL/CONICET) Predio CONICET-Santa Fe Colectora RN 168 Km 472, Paraje El Pozo 3000 Santa Fe, Argentina Tel: +54-342-4511594 (ext 1016) Tel/Fax: +54-342-4511169
