On Tue, 15 Jul 2014, Lisandro Dalcin wrote: > On 15 July 2014 11:19, Lisandro Dalcin <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 11 July 2014 15:35, Barry Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> On Jul 11, 2014, at 1:29 PM, Satish Balay <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> Yeah - I had merged this branch to next to test it out. Lisandro is > >>> on travel - so might not be checking e-mails. > >>> > >>> Perhaps tao/complex build should be enabled only for c99/complex.. > >> > >> Are all the failures only for C++ complex? How easy/hard would they be > >> too fix. In the long run just getting tao complex clean would make our > >> lives simpler. > >> > > > > I've just arrived to my final destination. Let me test a C++ complex > > build and fix it. I do not expect it to be hard. > > > > Satish, I pushed a fix to dalcinl/tao-complex_scalars, please merge > again in next. > > It was easy but tedious: just add PetscRealPart() in many places > https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/commits/658c1fc477a1980c4af05d671ad3d2160ec573ac
meregd to next now. Satish
