We're currently maintaining a (somewhat clumsy and limited, albeit functional) package manager in the form of the --download functionality. What do people think of outsourcing this to Spack, which would handle dependency resolution and report includes/libraries to PETSc? That would enable reuse of installed packages between different PETSC_ARCH and be more reliable regarding upgrade/downgrade when switching branches.
- [petsc-dev] --download and spack Jed Brown
- Re: [petsc-dev] --download and spack Matthew Knepley
- Re: [petsc-dev] --download and spack Smith, Barry F.
- Re: [petsc-dev] --download and spack Smith, Barry F.
- Re: [petsc-dev] --download and spack Smith, Barry F.
- Re: [petsc-dev] --download and spack Balay, Satish
- Re: [petsc-dev] --download and spack Smith, Barry F.
- Re: [petsc-dev] --download and s... Balay, Satish
- Re: [petsc-dev] --download and spack Balay, Satish
- Re: [petsc-dev] --download and spack Balay, Satish
- Re: [petsc-dev] --download and spack Jed Brown
