I don't know what failure you're referring to. The C++ complex thing might have been a matter of the antique compiler.
Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> writes: > Why did Mark have the gcc 10 failure on our example. Was it something with > did in it? > > Matt > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 12:43 PM Jed Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > >> You want this for PETSc or for external packages? We add it for a bunch >> of external packages. I've been building PETSc with gcc/gfortran-10 for >> months now. >> >> Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > Do we have gfortran from gcc 10 running anywhere? We need a check to >> enable >> > >> > -fallow-argument-mismatch >> > >> > from configure. Should be as simple as compiling Fortran which has >> > PetscObjectSetName() in it. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Matt >> > >> > -- >> > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their >> > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which >> their >> > experiments lead. >> > -- Norbert Wiener >> > >> > https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ < >> http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/> >> > > > -- > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their > experiments lead. > -- Norbert Wiener > > https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
