The C++ complex thing and the gfortran thing are totally unrelated except they both come from Mark and involve the Gnu community.
> On Jul 13, 2020, at 12:40 PM, Jed Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > > I don't know what failure you're referring to. The C++ complex thing might > have been a matter of the antique compiler. > > Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> writes: > >> Why did Mark have the gcc 10 failure on our example. Was it something with >> did in it? >> >> Matt >> >> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 12:43 PM Jed Brown <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> You want this for PETSc or for external packages? We add it for a bunch >>> of external packages. I've been building PETSc with gcc/gfortran-10 for >>> months now. >>> >>> Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> writes: >>> >>>> Do we have gfortran from gcc 10 running anywhere? We need a check to >>> enable >>>> >>>> -fallow-argument-mismatch >>>> >>>> from configure. Should be as simple as compiling Fortran which has >>>> PetscObjectSetName() in it. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Matt >>>> >>>> -- >>>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their >>>> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which >>> their >>>> experiments lead. >>>> -- Norbert Wiener >>>> >>>> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ < >>> http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/> >>> >> >> >> -- >> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their >> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their >> experiments lead. >> -- Norbert Wiener >> >> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
