On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 3:55 PM Mark Adams <[email protected]> wrote: > It's been fixed and it's in my F90 test. >
Did you take out the -fallow_... ? Matt > On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 3:54 PM Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 3:50 PM Mark Adams <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 1:40 PM Jed Brown <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I don't know what failure you're referring to. The C++ complex thing >>>> might have been a matter of the antique compiler. >>>> >>> >>> The failure was fixed with -fallow_ .... but it gave warnings. >>> >> >> Mark, can you try Barry's fix, changing the declaration of >> PetscObjectSetName()? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Matt >> >> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> writes: >>>> >>>> > Why did Mark have the gcc 10 failure on our example. Was it something >>>> with >>>> > did in it? >>>> > >>>> > Matt >>>> > >>>> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 12:43 PM Jed Brown <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> You want this for PETSc or for external packages? We add it for a >>>> bunch >>>> >> of external packages. I've been building PETSc with gcc/gfortran-10 >>>> for >>>> >> months now. >>>> >> >>>> >> Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> writes: >>>> >> >>>> >> > Do we have gfortran from gcc 10 running anywhere? We need a check >>>> to >>>> >> enable >>>> >> > >>>> >> > -fallow-argument-mismatch >>>> >> > >>>> >> > from configure. Should be as simple as compiling Fortran which has >>>> >> > PetscObjectSetName() in it. >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Thanks, >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Matt >>>> >> > >>>> >> > -- >>>> >> > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their >>>> >> > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to >>>> which >>>> >> their >>>> >> > experiments lead. >>>> >> > -- Norbert Wiener >>>> >> > >>>> >> > https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ < >>>> >> http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/> >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their >>>> > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which >>>> their >>>> > experiments lead. >>>> > -- Norbert Wiener >>>> > >>>> > https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ < >>>> http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/> >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their >> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their >> experiments lead. >> -- Norbert Wiener >> >> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ >> <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/> >> > -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
