Trimming the plex would essentially make another plex anyway, but it is
not hard using DMPlexFilter().
Thanks,
Matt
Thanks
--
Nicolas
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>
> Sample code:
> static char help[] = "Tests plex distribution and overlaps.\n";
>
> #include <petsc/private/dmpleximpl.h>
>
> int main (int argc, char * argv[]) {
>
> DM dm, odm;
> MPI_Comm comm;
> PetscErrorCode ierr;
>
> ierr = PetscInitialize(&argc, &argv, NULL, help);if (ierr)
> return ierr;
> comm = PETSC_COMM_WORLD;
>
> ierr = DMPlexCreateBoxMesh(comm, 2, PETSC_TRUE, NULL,
NULL, NULL,
> NULL, PETSC_TRUE, &dm);CHKERRQ(ierr);
> ierr = DMSetFromOptions(dm);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>
>
>
> ierr = PetscObjectSetName((PetscObject) dm, "DM
> before");CHKERRQ(ierr);
> ierr = DMViewFromOptions(dm, NULL,
"-before_dm_view");CHKERRQ(ierr);
> DMPlexDistributeOverlap(dm, 0, NULL, &odm);
> ierr = PetscObjectSetName((PetscObject) odm, "DM
> after");CHKERRQ(ierr);
> ierr = DMViewFromOptions(odm, NULL,
"-after_dm_view");CHKERRQ(ierr);
>
>
> ierr = DMDestroy(&dm);CHKERRQ(ierr);
> ierr = DMDestroy(&odm);CHKERRQ(ierr);
> ierr = PetscFinalize();
> return ierr;
> }
>
> % mpiexec -n 2 ./test_overlapV3 -dm_plex_box_faces 5,5
-dm_distribute
> -before_dm_view -after_dm_view
> DM Object: DM before 2 MPI processes
> type: plex
> DM before in 2 dimensions:
> 0-cells: 21 21
> 1-cells: 45 45
> 2-cells: 25 25
> Labels:
> depth: 3 strata with value/size (0 (21), 1 (45), 2 (25))
> celltype: 3 strata with value/size (0 (21), 1 (45), 3 (25))
> marker: 1 strata with value/size (1 (21))
> Face Sets: 1 strata with value/size (1 (10))
> DM Object: DM after 2 MPI processes
> type: plex
> DM after in 2 dimensions:
> 0-cells: 29 29
> 1-cells: 65 65
> 2-cells: 37 37
> Labels:
> depth: 3 strata with value/size (0 (29), 1 (65), 2 (37))
> celltype: 3 strata with value/size (0 (29), 1 (65), 3 (37))
> marker: 1 strata with value/size (1 (27))
> Face Sets: 1 strata with value/size (1 (13))
>
>
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > --
> > Nicolas
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Matt
> > >
> > > if (!dm) {printf("Big problem\n"); dm = odm;}
> > > else {DMDestroy(&odm);}
> > > ierr = PetscObjectSetName((PetscObject) dm,
"Initial
> > > DM");CHKERRQ(ierr);
> > > ierr = DMViewFromOptions(dm, NULL,
> > > "-initial_dm_view");CHKERRQ(ierr);
> > >
> > >
> > > ierr = DMDestroy(&dm);CHKERRQ(ierr);
> > > ierr = PetscFinalize();
> > > return ierr;
> > > }
> > >
> > > called with mpiexec -n 2 ./test_overlapV3
-initial_dm_view
> > > -dm_plex_box_faces 5,5 -dm_distribute
> > >
> > > gives:
> > > DM Object: Initial DM 2 MPI processes
> > > type: plex
> > > Initial DM in 2 dimensions:
> > > 0-cells: 29 29
> > > 1-cells: 65 65
> > > 2-cells: 37 37
> > > Labels:
> > > depth: 3 strata with value/size (0 (29), 1
(65), 2
> (37))
> > > celltype: 3 strata with value/size (0 (29), 1
> (65), 3 (37))
> > > marker: 1 strata with value/size (1 (27))
> > > Face Sets: 1 strata with value/size (1 (13))
> > >
> > > which is not what I expect ?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > --
> > > Nicolas
> > >
> > > On 31/03/2021 19:02, Matthew Knepley wrote:
> > > > Alright, I think the problem had to do with
keeping
> track
> > of what
> > > DM you
> > > > were looking at. This code increases the
overlap of an
> > initial DM:
> > > >
> > > > static char help[] = "Tests plex
distribution and
> > overlaps.\n";
> > > >
> > > > #include <petsc/private/dmpleximpl.h>
> > > >
> > > > int main (int argc, char * argv[]) {
> > > >
> > > > DM dm, dm2;
> > > > PetscInt overlap;
> > > > MPI_Comm comm;
> > > > PetscErrorCode ierr;
> > > >
> > > > ierr = PetscInitialize(&argc, &argv, NULL,
> help);if (ierr)
> > > return ierr;
> > > > comm = PETSC_COMM_WORLD;
> > > >
> > > > ierr = DMPlexCreateBoxMesh(comm, 2,
PETSC_TRUE,
> NULL,
> > NULL, NULL,
> > > > NULL, PETSC_TRUE, &dm);CHKERRQ(ierr);
> > > > ierr = DMSetFromOptions(dm);CHKERRQ(ierr);
> > > > ierr = PetscObjectSetName((PetscObject)
dm, "Initial
> > > DM");CHKERRQ(ierr);
> > > > ierr = DMViewFromOptions(dm, NULL,
> > > "-initial_dm_view");CHKERRQ(ierr);
> > > >
> > > > ierr = DMPlexGetOverlap(dm,
&overlap);CHKERRQ(ierr);
> > > > ierr = DMPlexDistributeOverlap(dm,
overlap+1, NULL,
> > > &dm2);CHKERRQ(ierr);
> > > > ierr = PetscObjectSetName((PetscObject) dm2,
> "More Overlap
> > > > DM");CHKERRQ(ierr);
> > > > ierr = DMViewFromOptions(dm2, NULL,
> > > "-over_dm_view");CHKERRQ(ierr);
> > > >
> > > > ierr = DMDestroy(&dm2);CHKERRQ(ierr);
> > > > ierr = DMDestroy(&dm);CHKERRQ(ierr);
> > > > ierr = PetscFinalize();
> > > > return ierr;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > and when we run it we get the expected result
> > > >
> > > > master *:~/Downloads/tmp/Nicolas$
> > /PETSc3/petsc/apple/bin/mpiexec
> > > -n 2
> > > > ./test_overlap -initial_dm_view
-dm_plex_box_faces 5,5
> > > -dm_distribute
> > > > -dm_distribute_overlap 1 -over_dm_view
> > > > DM Object: Initial DM 2 MPI processes
> > > > type: plex
> > > > Initial DM in 2 dimensions:
> > > > 0-cells: 29 29
> > > > 1-cells: 65 65
> > > > 2-cells: 37 37
> > > > Labels:
> > > > depth: 3 strata with value/size (0 (29),
1 (65),
> 2 (37))
> > > > celltype: 3 strata with value/size (0 (29), 1
> (65), 3 (37))
> > > > marker: 1 strata with value/size (1 (27))
> > > > Face Sets: 1 strata with value/size (1 (13))
> > > > DM Object: More Overlap DM 2 MPI processes
> > > > type: plex
> > > > More Overlap DM in 2 dimensions:
> > > > 0-cells: 36 36
> > > > 1-cells: 85 85
> > > > 2-cells: 50 50
> > > > Labels:
> > > > depth: 3 strata with value/size (0 (36),
1 (85),
> 2 (50))
> > > > celltype: 3 strata with value/size (0 (36), 1
> (85), 3 (50))
> > > > marker: 1 strata with value/size (1 (40))
> > > > Face Sets: 1 strata with value/size (1 (20))
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Matt
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 12:57 PM Matthew Knepley
> > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>
> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>>
> > > > <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>
> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Okay, let me show a really simple
example that
> gives
> > the expected
> > > > result before I figure out what is going
wrong for
> > you. This code
> > > >
> > > > static char help[] = "Tests plex
distribution and
> > overlaps.\n";
> > > >
> > > > #include <petsc/private/dmpleximpl.h>
> > > >
> > > > int main (int argc, char * argv[]) {
> > > > DM dm;
> > > > MPI_Comm comm;
> > > > PetscErrorCode ierr;
> > > >
> > > > ierr = PetscInitialize(&argc, &argv,
NULL,
> help);if
> > (ierr)
> > > return
> > > > ierr;
> > > > comm = PETSC_COMM_WORLD;
> > > >
> > > > ierr = DMPlexCreateBoxMesh(comm, 2,
> PETSC_TRUE, NULL,
> > > NULL, NULL,
> > > > NULL, PETSC_TRUE, &dm);CHKERRQ(ierr);
> > > > ierr =
DMSetFromOptions(dm);CHKERRQ(ierr);
> > > > ierr =
PetscObjectSetName((PetscObject) dm,
> "Initial
> > > > DM");CHKERRQ(ierr);
> > > > ierr = DMViewFromOptions(dm, NULL,
> > > "-initial_dm_view");CHKERRQ(ierr);
> > > > ierr = DMDestroy(&dm);CHKERRQ(ierr);
> > > > ierr = PetscFinalize();
> > > > return ierr;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > can do all the overlap tests. For
example, you
> can run
> > it naively
> > > > and get a serial mesh
> > > >
> > > > master *:~/Downloads/tmp/Nicolas$
> > > /PETSc3/petsc/apple/bin/mpiexec -n
> > > > 2 ./test_overlap -initial_dm_view
> -dm_plex_box_faces 5,5
> > > > DM Object: Initial DM 2 MPI processes
> > > > type: plex
> > > > Initial DM in 2 dimensions:
> > > > 0-cells: 36 0
> > > > 1-cells: 85 0
> > > > 2-cells: 50 0
> > > > Labels:
> > > > celltype: 3 strata with value/size (0
(36),
> 3 (50),
> > 1 (85))
> > > > depth: 3 strata with value/size (0
(36), 1
> (85), 2
> > (50))
> > > > marker: 1 strata with value/size (1 (40))
> > > > Face Sets: 1 strata with value/size
(1 (20))
> > > >
> > > > Then run it telling Plex to distribute after
> creating
> > the mesh
> > > >
> > > > master *:~/Downloads/tmp/Nicolas$
> > > /PETSc3/petsc/apple/bin/mpiexec -n
> > > > 2 ./test_overlap -initial_dm_view
> -dm_plex_box_faces 5,5
> > > -dm_distribute
> > > > DM Object: Initial DM 2 MPI processes
> > > > type: plex
> > > > Initial DM in 2 dimensions:
> > > > 0-cells: 21 21
> > > > 1-cells: 45 45
> > > > 2-cells: 25 25
> > > > Labels:
> > > > depth: 3 strata with value/size (0
(21), 1
> (45), 2
> > (25))
> > > > celltype: 3 strata with value/size (0
(21),
> 1 (45),
> > 3 (25))
> > > > marker: 1 strata with value/size (1 (21))
> > > > Face Sets: 1 strata with value/size
(1 (10))
> > > >
> > > > The get the same thing back with overlap = 0
> > > >
> > > > master *:~/Downloads/tmp/Nicolas$
> > > /PETSc3/petsc/apple/bin/mpiexec -n
> > > > 2 ./test_overlap -initial_dm_view
> -dm_plex_box_faces 5,5
> > > > -dm_distribute -dm_distribute_overlap 0
> > > > DM Object: Initial DM 2 MPI processes
> > > > type: plex
> > > > Initial DM in 2 dimensions:
> > > > 0-cells: 21 21
> > > > 1-cells: 45 45
> > > > 2-cells: 25 25
> > > > Labels:
> > > > depth: 3 strata with value/size (0
(21), 1
> (45), 2
> > (25))
> > > > celltype: 3 strata with value/size (0
(21),
> 1 (45),
> > 3 (25))
> > > > marker: 1 strata with value/size (1 (21))
> > > > Face Sets: 1 strata with value/size
(1 (10))
> > > >
> > > > and get larger local meshes with overlap = 1
> > > >
> > > > master *:~/Downloads/tmp/Nicolas$
> > > /PETSc3/petsc/apple/bin/mpiexec -n
> > > > 2 ./test_overlap -initial_dm_view
> -dm_plex_box_faces 5,5
> > > > -dm_distribute -dm_distribute_overlap 1
> > > > DM Object: Initial DM 2 MPI processes
> > > > type: plex
> > > > Initial DM in 2 dimensions:
> > > > 0-cells: 29 29
> > > > 1-cells: 65 65
> > > > 2-cells: 37 37
> > > > Labels:
> > > > depth: 3 strata with value/size (0
(29), 1
> (65), 2
> > (37))
> > > > celltype: 3 strata with value/size (0
(29),
> 1 (65),
> > 3 (37))
> > > > marker: 1 strata with value/size (1 (27))
> > > > Face Sets: 1 strata with value/size
(1 (13))
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Matt
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 12:22 PM Nicolas
Barral
> > > > <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
> > <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>>
> > > <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
> > <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>>>
> > > >
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
> > <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>>
> > > <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
> > <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > @+
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Nicolas
> > > >
> > > > On 31/03/2021 17:51, Matthew Knepley
wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 9:27 AM
Nicolas
> Barral
> > > > >
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
> > <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>>
> > > <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
> > <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>>>
> > > >
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
> > <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>>
> > > <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
> > <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>>>>
> > > > >
> <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
> > <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>>
> > > <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
> > <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>>>
> > > >
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
> > <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>>
> > > <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
> > <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > First, I'm not sure I understand
> what the
> > overlap
> > > > parameter in
> > > > > DMPlexDistributeOverlap does. I
> tried the
> > following:
> > > > generate a small
> > > > > mesh on 1 rank with
> DMPlexCreateBoxMesh, then
> > > distribute
> > > > it with
> > > > > DMPlexDistribute. At this point I
> have two nice
> > > > partitions, with shared
> > > > > vertices and no overlapping
cells.
> Then I call
> > > > DMPlexDistributeOverlap
> > > > > with the overlap parameter
set to 0
> or 1,
> > and get the
> > > > same resulting
> > > > > plex in both cases. Why is that ?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The overlap parameter says how
many cell
> > adjacencies to go
> > > > out. You
> > > > > should not get the same
> > > > > mesh out. We have lots of
examples that use
> > this. If
> > > you send
> > > > your small
> > > > > example, I can probably
> > > > > tell you what is happening.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ok so I do have a small example on
that and the
> > DMClone
> > > thing I
> > > > set up
> > > > to understand! I attach it to the email.
> > > >
> > > > For the overlap, you can change the
overlap
> > constant at
> > > the top
> > > > of the
> > > > file. With OVERLAP=0 or 1, the
distributed
> > overlapping mesh
> > > > (shown using
> > > > -over_dm_view, it's DMover) are the
same, and
> > different
> > > from the
> > > > mesh
> > > > before distributing the overlap
(shown using
> > > -distrib_dm_view). For
> > > > larger overlap values they're different.
> > > >
> > > > The process is:
> > > > 1/ create a DM dm on 1 rank
> > > > 2/ clone dm into dm2
> > > > 3/ distribute dm
> > > > 4/ clone dm into dm3
> > > > 5/ distribute dm overlap
> > > >
> > > > I print all the DMs after each step.
dm has a
> > distributed
> > > > overlap, dm2
> > > > is not distributed, dm3 is
distributed but
> without
> > > overlap. Since
> > > > distribute and distributeOverlap
create new
> DMs, I
> > don't seem
> > > > have a
> > > > problem with the shallow copies.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Second, I'm wondering what
would be
> a good
> > way to
> > > handle
> > > > two overlaps
> > > > > and associated local vectors.
In my
> adaptation
> > > code, the
> > > > remeshing
> > > > > library requires a
non-overlapping mesh,
> > while the
> > > > refinement criterion
> > > > > computation is based on hessian
> > computations, which
> > > > require a layer of
> > > > > overlap. What I can do is
clone the
> dm before
> > > > distributing the overlap,
> > > > > then manage two independent plex
> objects with
> > > their own
> > > > local sections
> > > > > etc. and copy/trim local vectors
> manually.
> > Is there a
> > > > more automatic
> > > > > way
> > > > > to do this ?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > DMClone() is a shallow copy, so that
> will not work.
> > > You would
> > > > maintain
> > > > > two different Plexes, overlapping
> > > > > and non-overlapping, with their
own sections
> > and vecs. Are
> > > > you sure you
> > > > > need to keep around the
non-overlapping one?
> > > > > Maybe if I understood what operations
> you want
> > to work, I
> > > > could say
> > > > > something more definitive.
> > > > >
> > > > I need to be able to pass the
> non-overlapping mesh
> > to the
> > > > remesher. I
> > > > can either maintain 2 plexes, or
trim the
> overlapping
> > > plex when
> > > > I create
> > > > the arrays I give to the remesher.
I'm not sure
> > which is the
> > > > best/worst ?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Nicolas
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > Matt
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Nicolas
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > What most experimenters take for
granted
> before
> > they
> > > begin their
> > > > > experiments is infinitely more
> interesting than any
> > > results
> > > > to which
> > > > > their experiments lead.
> > > > > -- Norbert Wiener
> > > > >
> > > > > https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
> > > > <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > What most experimenters take for granted
before
> they
> > begin their
> > > > experiments is infinitely more
interesting than any
> > results
> > > to which
> > > > their experiments lead.
> > > > -- Norbert Wiener
> > > >
> > > > https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
> > > > <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > What most experimenters take for granted before
> they begin
> > their
> > > > experiments is infinitely more interesting
than any
> > results to which
> > > > their experiments lead.
> > > > -- Norbert Wiener
> > > >
> > > > https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
> > > <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > What most experimenters take for granted before
they begin
> their
> > > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any
> results to which
> > > their experiments lead.
> > > -- Norbert Wiener
> > >
> > > https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
> > <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin
their
> > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any
results to which
> > their experiments lead.
> > -- Norbert Wiener
> >
> > https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
> <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
>
>
>
> --
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which
> their experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
>
> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
<http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
--
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which
their experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
