[In a message on 01 May 2006 01:51:35 PDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:] >This works adequetly (How could it be "better"? Sounds like zealot >speak to me.) if the boxes only function is NAT, but if it also runs >external services queueing inbound traffic on the internal interface >doesn't work, because external services get priority.
Is it a firewall or a dessert topping? Firewalls should firewall, not serve services. If you can't afford one box to firewall, and another to provide services, well, you're in a fix. I got a Sun IPX I'll give you if you pay shipping (anything to end this topic) -- Hardly sucks any juice, too. I'm sure I'm part of a large majority of list members who would be thrilled to see this topic end. While there's no harm in asking for a feature expansion, and a discussion about the technical feasibility of it, when it devolves into accusations of "zealot speak", it's time to move on. Sean PS You're all buying your CDs, right? Once I'm employed again, I will be.
