On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Karl O. Pinc wrote: > Too bad that pfsync (or something) can't sync anchors. I imagine > there'd be some configuration involved, maybe to say > which anchors the current box will allow to be synced, but > that would take care of ftp-proxy failover. It would also
No, that wouldn't be enough. What would have to be synced is the state and buffers of all established TCP connections in the kernel _and_ the internal state of the ftp-proxy. I don't think that's feasible.
