On 06/21/2006 06:45:48 AM, Camiel Dobbelaar wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> Too bad that pfsync (or something) can't sync anchors. I imagine
> there'd be some configuration involved, maybe to say
> which anchors the current box will allow to be synced, but
> that would take care of ftp-proxy failover. It would also
No, that wouldn't be enough. What would have to be synced is the
state
and buffers of all established TCP connections in the kernel _and_ the
internal state of the ftp-proxy. I don't think that's feasible.
I sure didn't think that one through.
Karl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein
