Hi All
This is dangerous as George Haines' mail will send out a zillion
messages (PBPFC) but here goes....
Does anyone have any comments/can throw any light on the reasoning
behind the PFC architecture. I find it strange (and annoying) that the
main pfc libraries refer to objects in the pfe libraries, thereby
forcing the use to the extension layer. What really irks me is that
PS/Sybase themselves don't use this architecture! - just look at some of
the utilities they supply (APU etc). They have a pfc layer equivilent
to the pfe layer and an app layer.
I thought class librarie/frameworks were supposed to be layered in such
a way that you could stick bits inbetween or leave out all together if
you wanted too without having to resort to Extender Utilities.
I'll be interested in any comments you have
Regards
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------+
Bruce Nordstrand
KSL Consulting Pty Ltd
P.O. Box 4852, North Rocks, NSW 2151, Australia
Phone: +61 2 9873-6256 Fax: +61 2 9873-6216
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.ksl.com.au
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------+
PCDocs/Fulcrum <http://www.pcdocs.com/> Alliance Network
Member
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] HOSTED BY IIGG, INC. FOR HELP WITH LIST SERVE COMMANDS, ADDRESS
> A MESSAGE TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] WITH THE FOLLOWING MESSAGE: help pfcsig
> SEND ALL OTHER INQUIRES TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
