Thanks Boris,
For enlightening us stuck-in-PB-mode developers about the versatility of
EAStudio. I promptly passed ur newsletter around our dev. grp consisting of
a now reduced in strength PB developers. We are all now excited by the
prospects and features offered by the next gen. of suites from Sybase. Our
company has traditional been a PB/Oracle shop and have recently decided to
change to VB/MTS/NT/Oracle.
Its probably late but we hope to be able influence things now. In the brave
new world of web development with the plethora of suites available it kinda
gets difficult to wade oneself around. What with a myriad of things to learn
with their own learning curves.
But there is hope we PB/PFC guys would be around when the rough weather
wears off.
Bye and thanks for sharing this precious info,
Karthik S.
Boris Gasin wrote:
> David,
>
> While developers are still stuck in the mode of comparing front end
> tools, tool vendor companies are shifting their focus toward the
> application server market.
>
> Don't compare VP to PB but compare their application servers!
> EAServer / MTS / Oracle 8I? Better yet first standardize on the
> distributed architecture COM - NT only, pushed by MS or CORBA pushed
> by everyone but MS.
>
> A common mistake made by PB developers in your situation is to go into
> this debate armed with their PB experience. Compared to VB+COM+MTS PB
> cannot win. PB / EAServer combination is a different story. A
> general note to everyone: Unless you educate yourself on EAServer
> features PB will not have a future in your shop.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] HOSTED BY IIGG, INC. FOR HELP WITH LIST SERVE COMMANDS, ADDRESS
> A MESSAGE TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] WITH THE FOLLOWING MESSAGE: help pfcsig
> SEND ALL OTHER INQUIRES TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
