On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 6:12 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote:

> Hi
>
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 4:06 PM, Joao De Almeida Pereira <
> jdealmeidapere...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
>> Hi Murtuza,
>>
>> The code change works, and I passed the patches through our pipeline and
>> everything is green.
>> Personally I would love this bug fixes to have refactored the function
>> into smaller chunk and made it more readable so that the next time someone
>> need to check out a problem in the same area it is easier. I understand
>> that without a good test coverage it is hard to have confidence while
>> refactoring, but we need to start somewhere.
>>
>
> Are you planning to look into this Murtuza?
>
​Yes Dave, I am working on another issue, I'll pick up after that.​


>
>
>>
>> @Hackers
>> Here is a video that I saw some time ago about refactoring existing code
>> and code complexity that is very interesting
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8bZh5LMaSmE
>> In this video Sandi Metz does the Gilded Rose Kata in a talk in RailsConf
>> 2014, and with it tries to demonstrate that code can be refactored and with
>> that it make the code much more simpler. But the journey is not always
>> simple and the complexity will increase before it get simpler. It is a good
>> example of something that we can try with our code.
>>
>
> Nice!
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>

Reply via email to