On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Adam Brusselback <adambrusselb...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm just wondering what the thought process is for making the shortcuts > configurable, or why that's going to be significantly hard? I find that to > be highly desirable feature, one of the reasons being avoiding something > like this from happening (with browser bindings). Some of us have other > tools which are also unconfigurable and bind to the same keys, and now you > have conflicts between them. > > However, what I think doesn't matter at all in the scheme of things, I'm > just throwing in my $0.02.
It's not that it's necessarily hard, it's that there are only 24 hours in the day to get things done. We've got a long list of improvements to make - some immediate (i.e. in time for betaX - 2 being today in fact), others for GA and others for future releases. Meanwhile, much as I'd like to, I cannot keep 10 people assigned to pgAdmin indefinitely. I do need to get them working on other projects, for which there are also deadlines. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
