18 maja 2017 22:43 - "Dave Page" <dp...@pgadmin.org>: > On 18 May 2017, at 21:09, Eric Hill <eric.h...@jmp.com> wrote: > >> Hey, >> >> I don’t mean to hurt anyone’s feelings or anything, but is it not obvious to >> everyone that pgAdmin >> 4 (I have version 1.4) is bloody horrendous? It is absolutely as slow as >> Christmas. It’s use of >> screen real-estate is poor. I was never a huge fan of pgAdmin III; I mean, >> it seemed to do its job >> okay, but after using pgAdmin 4, suddenly I have newfound respect for >> pgAdmin III. > > Not to me, because the number of people I've had complimenting pgAdmin 4 is > probably 20x the number > who have said they don't like it. Which is a good sign - normally people who > don't like something > are far more likely to say something. > > Either way, I'm not going to lose sleep over it. pgAdmin 4 is far more stable > than pgAdmin 3 was, > has attracted more new developers in a year than pgAdmin 3 had in 15, and > continues to improve with > every release. I'm very proud of the way the team have built such a complex > application in such a > short space of time that many people have told me they like. > > You can't please everyone unfortunately, but then a) it's free (despite being > estimated at over $2M > worth of work), and b) it's open source so those that are inclined can help > improve it further. > > Constructive feedback is always welcome of course. In your case maybe you > could explain how you're > using it such that you see slow response. For me, it performs well, even on > my low powered 1.2GHz > MacBook. It's naturally slower than pgAdmin 3 of course, as it's not a native > application, but it > still outpaces my ability to drive it and I'm no slouch behind the keyboard.
You don't care what You users say about Your software??? That's a nice statement... I've posted here a list of what is missing/wrong in new pgAdmin - did You even commented on that? What is this 'Constructive feedback'? How 4 is more stable than 3? Please explain it to us... In 1.4 - query SELECT 2/0; returns successfully... And please, please explain to us how 'less and slower' is better than 'more and faster'... I must ask it - do You even work with databases? Because from how You made new pgAdmin, it looks like You don't have a clue what real dbadmins do... You say pgAdmin 4 attracted more developers... I don't know how You measure it but for me - a guy with more than 10 years work experience with PostgreSQL - it's a sign to move to another db... I must say - You had a possibility that few developers have - make software from scratch - and You made all possible mistakes: - wrong toolkit (html... really??? - so many fast, portable toolkits and You picked the slowest...) - less functionality (can't even copy/paste data from query...) - waaay slower (10 times at least for everything - queries, browsing - even ui drags behind mouse) - released alpha as stable. - ... -- Tomek -- Sent via pgadmin-support mailing list (pgadmin-support@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-support
