Le dimanche 27/10/13 à 08h27,
Christian Feuersaenger <cfeuersaen...@googlemail.com> a écrit :

> Hi Denis,

Hi Christian,

> thanks for the feature request.

You're welcome: thanks to you for your answer! :)

> So what you like to do would be
> 
> \pgfmathprintnumber{1,5}  and get 1,50 or something like that, right?

That's probably what I requested implies...

> Unfortunately, since the number parser is closely tight to the 
> expression parser as well, you would also have the effect
> 
> \pgfmathparse{ 1,5 + 0,5 }
> 
> and would expect 2.0 as result.

Indeed.

> I fear this, in turn, has a couple of risks... I am unsure of wether
> that would be a good idea.

Well, I must admit this kind of side effects didn't come to my mind.

> Well, maybe I can add an option like that.

Could be nice.

> But it would probably cause defects when it is combined with
> expression parsing.

I could proceed to some tests if you specify to me what are the contexts
where these defects could arise.

Kind regards.
-- 
Denis

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from 
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135991&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Pgfplots-features mailing list
Pgfplots-features@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pgfplots-features

Reply via email to