On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 08:31:27PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > I am not sure if it is much interesting to keep around this table set > for pg_upgrade, so I would drop it. Except for that, the result looks > fine. I'll double-check and wrap it tomorrow on HEAD and REL_11_STABLE. > The optimizations mentioned sound interesting, though I would recommend > to not risk the stability of v11 at this point, so let's keep them for > v12~.
So at the end I have dropped the table from the test, and pushed the patch to HEAD and REL_11_STABLE. Thanks David for the patch, and others for the reviews. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
