On 2016-09-12 21:25:05 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Hm, lapwing says this can't run in parallel with "misc" either :-(
Gah. That's probably why I had originally had it running in the rules group. But isn't that user_relns() test just a bad idea independent of this failure? I mean what's the benefit of returning all relations there, besides causing regression test churn? If you look at a git blame you can see that there's quite a bit of changes in those few lines of expected output. > I'm not sure about the change you made to have generate_series output > just one row --- isn't that losing some of the point of the test? For me the test was mostly verifying that the pushdown logic does something sensible, namely that the aggrefs are at the right level. Andres -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
