Andres Freund <[email protected]> writes:
> On 2016-09-12 21:33:03 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It looks like making your tables temp would work around it ...
> Right. But the more general question about the value of that test
> remain. Not that the tables in this test matter given how simple they
> are, but in general it doesn't hurt to have objects survive the
> regression tests, to increase dump coverage.
> Shouldn't we just drop that test?
Fair question --- it's not immediately obvious what that tests
that isn't covered at least as well by the adjacent tests.
The git history isn't much help: all of that came in in one big
commit from Tom Lockhart.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
