On 2016-09-12 21:49:47 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <[email protected]> writes: > > On 2016-09-12 21:33:03 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> It looks like making your tables temp would work around it ... > > > Right. But the more general question about the value of that test > > remain. Not that the tables in this test matter given how simple they > > are, but in general it doesn't hurt to have objects survive the > > regression tests, to increase dump coverage. > > > Shouldn't we just drop that test? > > Fair question --- it's not immediately obvious what that tests > that isn't covered at least as well by the adjacent tests. > The git history isn't much help: all of that came in in one big > commit from Tom Lockhart.
Well, then let's drop it (including the definition of user_relns). Doing so unless somebody protests pdq. Andres -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
