> The real problem here is that you've still failed to > establish any sizable benefit from converting. As best I can > tell at the moment, the acceptable options for editing XML > will be about the same as they are for SGML: emacs, and not a > lot else. I don't really see why I should have to start > spelling out every closing tag for a no-op like that.
Visual Studio has a *very* nice XML editor these days, and they don't do SGML... (ok, ok, that's a joke. It's true, sure, but it's not very relevant...) //Magnus ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
