On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 21:56 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > The real problem here is that you've still failed to
> > establish any sizable benefit from converting. As best I can
> > tell at the moment, the acceptable options for editing XML
> > will be about the same as they are for SGML: emacs, and not a
> > lot else. I don't really see why I should have to start
> > spelling out every closing tag for a no-op like that.
>
> Visual Studio has a *very* nice XML editor these days, and they don't do
> SGML...
>
> (ok, ok, that's a joke. It's true, sure, but it's not very relevant...)
Actually it might be for Windows developers wishing to develop Windows
specific sections. How does it work with Docbook?
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> //Magnus
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
