On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 10:25:00 -0800 David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's good to explain why PG does what it does how it does it, and that > should be in that section of the FAQ, but continuing, even by silence, > with an answer equivalent to, "We don't do that. You shouldn't > either. Tough $#!+" only makes us look bad, where suggesting > alternatives for the use cases we don't cover makes us look good. I believe there is wording that could be used that would not convey that sentiment. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > Cheers, > David. -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
