Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 10:30:43 -0800 > "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I believe there is wording that could be used that would not convey > > that sentiment. > > Such as: > > PostgreSQL is designed as a client / server architecture and does not > normally embed in an optimal way. Discussion of other product solutions > to the embedded problem is outside the scope of this document.
I would suggest something less unfriendly, like "there are other open source databases that that are better suited for embedded usage." -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://mail.postgresql.org/mj/mj_wwwusr?domain=postgresql.org&extra=pgsql-docs