Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 10:30:43 -0800
> "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  
> > I believe there is wording that could be used that would not convey
> > that sentiment.
> 
> Such as:
> 
> PostgreSQL is designed as a client / server architecture and does not
> normally embed in an optimal way. Discussion of other product solutions
> to the embedded problem is outside the scope of this document.

I would suggest something less unfriendly, like "there are other open
source databases that that are better suited for embedded usage."

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://mail.postgresql.org/mj/mj_wwwusr?domain=postgresql.org&extra=pgsql-docs

Reply via email to