On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 01:25:35 -0500 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got nothing against SQLite. But I am unhappy with the idea of us > recommending *any* particular bit of software that is not under our > control, especially in a document that is as widespread and hard to > update as our FAQ. There are any number of scenarios where we might > want to take back such an endorsement, but once made it'll be out > there somewhere on the Web until cockroaches rule the earth. There > is also the whole class of arguments about "why'd you recommend X and > not Y?" that we'd surely get sucked into. Better not to go there in > the first place. I have to agree. As much as I actually like SQLite the reality is the only thing we can remotely guarantee is the quality of our own software and as Tom says, "cockroaches". I still find articles that I wrote 5 years ago that are not even remotely relevant any longer but I get emails about them. We need to focus the language on and about postgresql and postgresql only. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
