On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Thom Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > On 26 September 2010 18:07, Thom Brown <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 26 September 2010 17:49, Thom Brown <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I attach a patch which adds all functions (or at least the ones I >>> found) into the index so that they can be easily located. Previously >>> there were no entries for most of these at all in the index. I also >>> removed the entries for count, max, min and sum in the tutorial area >>> as per this discussion: >>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-docs/2010-09/msg00119.php . >>> These are no indexed on the aggregate function page. >>> >>> While I was updating the functions section, I also alphabetised any >>> unsorted function tables. >> >> I don't think my email reached the list, so reattaching a gzipped version. > > Is this on the radar? Copying in -hackers in case.
I took a quick look at it before, but it was too much to commit without more scrutiny than I had time to give it. Perhaps it would be useful to decompose this into several patches, and/or add it to the next CF. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
