On 4 October 2010 18:32, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Thom Brown <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 26 September 2010 18:07, Thom Brown <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 26 September 2010 17:49, Thom Brown <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> I attach a patch which adds all functions (or at least the ones I >>>> found) into the index so that they can be easily located. Previously >>>> there were no entries for most of these at all in the index. I also >>>> removed the entries for count, max, min and sum in the tutorial area >>>> as per this discussion: >>>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-docs/2010-09/msg00119.php . >>>> These are no indexed on the aggregate function page. >>>> >>>> While I was updating the functions section, I also alphabetised any >>>> unsorted function tables. >>> >>> I don't think my email reached the list, so reattaching a gzipped version. >> >> Is this on the radar? Copying in -hackers in case. > > I took a quick look at it before, but it was too much to commit > without more scrutiny than I had time to give it. Perhaps it would be > useful to decompose this into several patches, and/or add it to the > next CF.
Thanks Robert. I'll probably submit it for the next commitfest then :) -- Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ixion Registered Linux user: #516935 -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
