On sön, 2010-09-26 at 18:07 +0100, Thom Brown wrote: > On 26 September 2010 17:49, Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> wrote: > > I attach a patch which adds all functions (or at least the ones I > > found) into the index so that they can be easily located. Previously > > there were no entries for most of these at all in the index. I also > > removed the entries for count, max, min and sum in the tutorial area > > as per this discussion: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-docs/2010-09/msg00119.php . > > These are no indexed on the aggregate function page. > > > > While I was updating the functions section, I also alphabetised any > > unsorted function tables. > > I don't think my email reached the list, so reattaching a gzipped version.
Took a quick look now. What I find weird is that in some hunks you remove index entries from a table and place them in the surrounding section, and in other places you insert new index entries inside tables. I think the proper place for the index entries tends to be inside the table. -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
