On 22 February 2018 at 18:24, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Are there any other caveats in doing that this actually makes it dangerous >> to just allow bypassing it for extensions? > > Don't think so; we autovacuum such DBs anyway don't we?
Yeh, there is already precedent that should mean it is easy/default for background workers to ignore datallowcon. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
