Hi, On 2018-02-22 20:24:03 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: > In a background worker you can just set the parameter using > SetConfigOption(), no? That seems a lot easier than turning things in to a > kv pair and back...
Sure, but, it doesn't seem bad to offer the option to only allow this for code running as superuser. > I can see the point for having such a parameter for pg_upgrade, but I'm not > sure we'd necessarily want to overload them. What's the argument against? Greetings, Andres Freund
