On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 3:17 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> We, as in the core project, are not shipping it.

+1 for what JD said on that subject.

> I'm also unclear
> on why you want to exclude "fix the RPM packaging" as a reasonable
> solution.

Mostly because the complaint was about the *Debian* packaging.  Other
than that, it's possible that that's the way forward.

> It seems likely that some change in that packaging would
> be necessary anyway, as it wouldn't know today about any signaling
> method we might choose to adopt.
> Having said that, I'm not averse to providing a solution if it's robust,
> not too invasive and doesn't break other use-cases.  So far we've not
> seen a patch that meets those conditions.

Fair enough.

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Reply via email to