> On Apr 15, 2018, at 09:51, David Arnold <dar@xoe.solutions> wrote:
> 1. Throughout this vivid discussion a good portion of support has already 
> been manifested for the need of a more structured (machine readable) logging 
> format. There has been no substantial objection to this need.

I'm afraid I don't see that.  While it's true that as a standard, CSV is 
relatively ill-defined, as a practical matter in PostgreSQL it is very easy to 
write code that parses .csv format.

-- Christophe Pettus

Reply via email to