> On Apr 15, 2018, at 09:51, David Arnold <dar@xoe.solutions> wrote: > > 1. Throughout this vivid discussion a good portion of support has already > been manifested for the need of a more structured (machine readable) logging > format. There has been no substantial objection to this need.
I'm afraid I don't see that. While it's true that as a standard, CSV is relatively ill-defined, as a practical matter in PostgreSQL it is very easy to write code that parses .csv format. -- -- Christophe Pettus x...@thebuild.com
