> On Apr 15, 2018, at 09:51, David Arnold <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> 1. Throughout this vivid discussion a good portion of support has already
> been manifested for the need of a more structured (machine readable) logging
> format. There has been no substantial objection to this need.
I'm afraid I don't see that. While it's true that as a standard, CSV is
relatively ill-defined, as a practical matter in PostgreSQL it is very easy to
write code that parses .csv format.
-- Christophe Pettus