On 2023-01-16 Mo 14:34, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
>> OK, here's my version. It tests clean against all of crake's dump files
>> back to 9.2.
>> To some extent it's a matter of taste, but I hate very long regex lines
>> - it makes it very hard to see what's actually changing, so I broke up
>> most of those.
> I don't mind breaking things up, but I'm not terribly excited about
> making the patterns looser, as you've done in some places like
>
> if ($old_version < 14)
> {
> # Remove mentions of extended hash functions.
> - $dump =~
> - s/^(\s+OPERATOR 1 =\(integer,integer\)) ,\n\s+FUNCTION 2
> \(integer, integer\) public\.part_hashint4_noop\(integer,bigint\);/$1;/mg;
> - $dump =~
> - s/^(\s+OPERATOR 1 =\(text,text\)) ,\n\s+FUNCTION 2 \(text,
> text\) public\.part_hashtext_length\(text,bigint\);/$1;/mg;
> + $dump =~ s
> {(^\s+OPERATOR\s1\s=\((?:integer,integer|text,text)\))\s,\n
> + \s+FUNCTION\s2\s.*?public.part_hash.*?;}
> + {$1;}mxg;
> }
>
> I don't think that's any easier to read, and it risks masking
> diffs that we'd wish to know about.
OK, I'll make another pass and tighten things up.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
