Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 2023-01-16 Mo 14:34, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I don't think that's any easier to read, and it risks masking
>> diffs that we'd wish to know about.

> OK, I'll make another pass and tighten things up.

Don't sweat it, I'm just working the bugs out of a new version.
I'll have something to post shortly, I hope.

                        regards, tom lane


Reply via email to