On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 11:59:12AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quick notes:
> > <para>
> > Add Just-In-Time (<acronym>JIT</acronym>) compilation of plans
> > run the by the executor
> >(Andres Freund)
> > </para>
> > </listitem>
>
> It's currently not yet compilation of entire plans, but only parts. I
> think that's a relevant distinction because I'd like to add that as a
> feature to v12 ;). How about just adding 'parts of' or such? I'd also
> rephrase the plan and 'run by the executor a bit'. How about:
>
> Add Just-In-Time (<acronym>JIT</acronym>) compilation of parts of
> queries, to accelerate their execution.
OK, new text:
Add Just-In-Time (<acronym>JIT</acronym>) compilation of some
parts of query plans to improve execution speed (Andres Freund)
> > <listitem>
> ><!--
> >2018-03-20 [5b2526c83] Add configure infrastructure (- -with-llvm) to enable
> >LLV
> >-->
> >
> > <para>
> > Add configure flag <option>--with-llvm</option> to test for
> > <acronym>LLVM</acronym> support (Andres Freund)
> > </para>
> > </listitem>
> >
> > <listitem>
> ><!--
> >2018-03-20 [6869b4f25] Add C++ support to configure.
> >-->
> >
> > <para>
> > Have configure check for the availability of a C++ compiler
> > (Andres Freund)
> > </para>
> > </listitem>
> >
> > <listitem>
>
> I wonder if we shouldn't omit those, considering them part of the JIT
> entry? Not quite sure what our policy there is.
OK, removed.
--
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
