On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 12:28 PM Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> wrote: > I still have a question though: if a buffer is exclusive-locked, > unmodified and clean, and then the caller registers it and later does > PageSetLSN (just as if it were dirty), is that a definite bug? > > There are a couple callsites where the control flow is complex enough > that it's hard to be sure the buffer is always marked dirty before > being registered (like in log_heap_visible(), as I mentioned upthread). > But those callsites are all doing PageSetLSN, unlike the hash index > case.
I think that would be a bug. I think it would be OK to just change the page LSN and nothing else, but that requires calling MarkBufferDirty() at some point. If you only call PageSetLSN() and never MarkBufferDirty(), that sounds messed up: either the former should be skipped, or the latter should be added. We shouldn't modify a shared buffer without marking it dirty. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
