Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> writes: > Is everybody in agreement about committing and back patching this fix, > which simply disables the optimization altogether? > I myself don't see a better way, but thought I'd ask before proceeding > with review and commit.
If you don't see a clear path forward, then "disable" is the only
reasonable choice for the back branches. Maybe we'll find a fix
in future, but it seems unlikely that it'd be back-patchable.
regards, tom lane
