On Sun, 2 Mar 2025 at 01:35, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> writes: > > Is everybody in agreement about committing and back patching this fix, > > which simply disables the optimization altogether? > > I myself don't see a better way, but thought I'd ask before proceeding > > with review and commit. > > If you don't see a clear path forward, then "disable" is the only > reasonable choice for the back branches. Maybe we'll find a fix > in future, but it seems unlikely that it'd be back-patchable.
Agreed. Here's patch v5 for the master branch (now up to f4694e0f), with no interesting changes other than fixing apply conflicts caused by bfe56cdf. Kind regards, Matthias van de Meent Neon (https://neon.tech)
v5-0002-isolationtester-showing-broken-index-only-bitmap-.patch
Description: Binary data
v5-0001-Remove-HeapBitmapScan-s-skip_fetch-optimization.patch
Description: Binary data
