On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 12:20 PM Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> wrote: > I didn't look into the technical details to see what might be required > to allow that kind of collaboration, and I am not suggesting you > redesign the entire feature around that idea.
OK. It sounds to me like there is a good amount of support for going forward with something like what I have, even though some people might also like other things. What I feel is currently lacking is some review of the actual code. Would anyone like to do that? Here is a v2 with some documentation and regression tests for pg_overexplain added. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
v2-0002-Add-some-new-hooks-so-extensions-can-add-details-.patch
Description: Binary data
v2-0003-pg_overexplain-Additional-EXPLAIN-options-for-deb.patch
Description: Binary data
v2-0001-Make-it-possible-for-loadable-modules-to-add-EXPL.patch
Description: Binary data
