On 05/08/18 17:11, I wrote:
The only negative test there was, was to check for bogus
scram_channel_binding option, "scram_channel_binding=not-exists". Yeah,
it would be nice to have some, but this commit didn't really change that
situation.

Sorry, I see now that there was indeed a test for scram_channel_binding='', which meant "no channel binding". That was confusing, I assumed '' was the default.

I'm hoping that we add a libpq option to actually force channel binding
soon. That'll make channel binding actually useful to users, but it will
also make it easier to write tests to check that channel binding is
actually used or not used, in the right situations.

Nevertheless, this we should do.

- Heikki

Reply via email to