On 5 August 2018 19:01:04 EEST, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >Heikki Linnakangas <hlinn...@iki.fi> writes: >> Sorry, I see now that there was indeed a test for >> scram_channel_binding='', which meant "no channel binding". That was >> confusing, I assumed '' was the default. > >Ugh, it isn't? There's a general principle in libpq that setting a >parameter to an empty string is the same as leaving it unset. I think >violating that pattern is a bad idea.
Yeah. In any case, the whole option is gone now, so we're good. - Heikki
