Hi st 16. 4. 2025 v 19:43 odesÃlatel Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> napsal:
> Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 10:38:29AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > >> I agree that we should do something about this. I haven't reviewed > >> your patches but the approach sounds broadly reasonable. > > > Yep, we went down the road in PG 18 to convert syntax, and now we have > > to fix this, or we have to revert all the PG 18 syntax changes, which > > seems like a step backward. > > I'm confused? 0dca5d68d didn't have anything to do with > syntax changes, just with when planning happens. > yes, and for most cases it has significant performance benefits. For a few corner cases, there can be some slowdown that can be fixed by last Tom patches. Regards Pavel > regards, tom lane >
