Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 01:43:46PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm confused? 0dca5d68d didn't have anything to do with
>> syntax changes, just with when planning happens.
> I was referencing the contrib initialization functions you converted to
> use SQL-standard function bodies:
Nah, that's not really relevant. The speed concerns I have here
are mostly independent of whether the SQL function is written
in string or SQL-standard form. Also, I think all of those
contrib functions that are at all performance-relevant are
capable of being inlined, and so wouldn't reach this code anyway.
regards, tom lane
