On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 01:43:46PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 10:38:29AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> I agree that we should do something about this. I haven't reviewed
> >> your patches but the approach sounds broadly reasonable.
>
> > Yep, we went down the road in PG 18 to convert syntax, and now we have
> > to fix this, or we have to revert all the PG 18 syntax changes, which
> > seems like a step backward.
>
> I'm confused? 0dca5d68d didn't have anything to do with
> syntax changes, just with when planning happens.
I was referencing the contrib initialization functions you converted to
use SQL-standard function bodies:
commit 68ff25eef12
Author: Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Sun Dec 29 14:58:05 2024 -0500
contrib/pageinspect: Use SQL-standard function bodies.
In the same spirit as 969bbd0fa, 13e3796c9, 3f323eba8.
Tom Lane and Ronan Dunklau
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3316564.aeNJFYEL58@aivenlaptop
I thought that was what you were saying were now slower; maybe I was
confused.
--
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
