On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 09:58:08AM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote: > It seems like XLogFlush() and XLogNeedsFlush() should use the same > test, otherwise you could always get some confusing inconsistency. > Right?
Even if the checks are duplicated (dependency could be documented as well), it would make sense to me to plant a check of XLogNeedsFlush() inside XLogFlush(), I think. I have not tried if some parts of the tests blow up when trying to do that even after switching XLogNeedsFlush() to check if WAL inserts are allowed rather than if we are in recovery. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
