On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 10:21:27AM +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> Yeah, asserting it at the end makes sense, as we can ensure that
> XLogFlush() and XLogNeedsFlush() agree on the same thing without
> adding additional overhead.  Here is the revised one.

Melanie and Jeff, what do you think?
--
Michael

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to