Hi Michael, Chao, On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 11:32 AM Michael Paquier <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 10:30:31AM +0800, Chao Li wrote: > > Is really confused. The error message says “maximum of 64”, but the > > test right uses a name of length 64. I know that the tricky is the > > ‘\0’ terminator, but should SQL writer have to keep mind about the > > ‘\0’ terminator? Should they just consider maximum length as 63? > > Right. We could add a "- 1" to the error message printed.
Thanks for the patch. I also agree with Chao's suggestion that the error message better reflects the actual character limits. I implemented a patch for that and updated the test patch as well. Please check. Best, Xuneng
v2-0001-injection_points-Report-actual-character-limits-i.patch
Description: Binary data
v2-0002-injection_points-Add-tests-for-name-limits.patch
Description: Binary data
